Establishing a relation between Consumerism and Corruption

Consumerism becomes dangerous when lifestyle becomes larger than character. The real corruption begins before the bribe is taken. It begins when a person quietly accepts that image is more important than integrity.

Mohammad Danish

6/18/20264 min read

Consumerism does not corrupt everyone, but it creates a dangerous social pressure: the pressure to look richer than one actually is. A person may begin with a normal income, a decent family, and ordinary needs, but the modern marketplace constantly converts desires into “requirements.” A costly restaurant is no longer just food; it becomes a social signal. A big car is no longer transport; it becomes proof of success. Branded shoes, gym wear, office wear, party wear, sleepwear, travel wear, festival wear, and “casual luxury” become daily identity tools. The problem is not aspiration. Aspiration builds economies. The problem begins when aspiration becomes comparison, and comparison becomes desperation.

India’s own consumption data shows this shift clearly. The Household Consumption Expenditure Survey 2023–24 estimated average monthly per capita consumption expenditure at ₹4,122 in rural India and ₹6,996 in urban India, excluding the value of free welfare items. More importantly, spending is moving away from food and toward non-food lifestyle categories. Reuters reported from the same survey that non-food items now account for about 53% of rural per capita spending and 60% of urban spending, up from 47% and 57% respectively in 2011–12.¹

This means the average household is not merely eating better; it is spending more on mobility, communication, clothing, services, entertainment, personal care, education, healthcare, travel, and lifestyle signalling. The restaurant economy tells the same story. India’s foodservice market is estimated at USD 93.97 billion in 2026 and projected to reach USD 153.37 billion by 2031, driven by urbanisation, digital payments, rising working women participation, and prepared-meal demand.²

Dual-income households have added another layer. They improve financial independence and can improve quality of life, but they also expand the family’s spending capacity and expectations. Reports tracking India’s workforce show female labour force participation rising sharply in recent years; one analysis notes an increase from 23.3% in 2018 to 37% in 2023, while CEDA notes India’s overall labour force participation rose from 51.5% in 2017–18 to 60.5% in 2023–24, largely driven by female participation.³

This has a positive side: empowerment, resilience, better education, better homes, and stronger household savings. But there is also a hidden cost. When two incomes enter the house, society often does not say, “Now save more and live peacefully.” It says, “Now upgrade everything.” Better phone. Bigger car. Better school. Better holiday. Better interiors. Better wardrobe. Better birthday party. Better restaurant. Better Instagram life. Income rises, but the definition of “normal” rises faster.

Debt data confirms the pressure. India’s household debt stood at 41.9% of GDP by December 2024, and non-housing retail credit—personal loans, credit cards, consumer durable loans and other personal loans—has become a major part of household borrowing. RBI-linked reporting also warned of rising stress in consumption-linked borrowing, especially among lower-rated borrowers.⁴

This is where consumerism can become a gateway to corruption. A person who cannot afford a lifestyle but feels socially forced to display it may begin to compromise. In professional life, this can mean inflated bills, fake reimbursements, vendor kickbacks, misuse of office budgets, biased procurement, data manipulation, unethical sales promises, or bribery. In public life, it becomes “chai-paani,” speed money, favour trading, and position misuse. Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 gives India a score of 38–39 range depending on reporting format, placing it in the lower-middle band globally, showing that corruption remains a serious public-sector concern.⁵

The deeper corruption, however, is not only legal. It is emotional and relational. Consumerism can corrupt marriage when partners begin measuring each other by earning capacity, lifestyle delivery, gifts, holidays, and social comparison. Research on materialism consistently links it with poorer interpersonal relationships. A 2024 review found that materialistic values—where wealth and consumption are tied to success and happiness—negatively affect interpersonal relationships.⁶

It can corrupt parenting when parents replace presence with purchasing. A child receives toys, gadgets, classes, branded clothes, and expensive birthdays, but not enough time, listening, discipline, or emotional security. Dual-income parenting is not the problem by itself; many dual-income families raise excellent children. The issue is when earning more becomes the family’s central project and caregiving becomes outsourced, rushed, or guilt-driven.

It can corrupt work culture when people stop asking, “Am I doing meaningful work?” and start asking, “How fast can I upgrade my lifestyle?” Then the office becomes a battlefield of salary envy, title obsession, political networking, and shortcut behaviour. Studies on corruption psychology show that materialist values have been linked to corrupt behaviour, along with perceived social norms and organisational culture.⁷

The irony is that consumerism sells happiness but often manufactures insecurity. Once every activity needs a separate outfit, every meal needs a social-media-worthy location, every trip needs luxury, and every success needs public display, the ordinary person begins to feel poor even while earning more than previous generations. The family then becomes an earning unit, not an emotional unit.

The solution is not poverty, guilt, or anti-growth thinking. People should enjoy good food, good clothes, good travel, and better living. But the line must be redrawn between comfort and performance. A family needs income, but it also needs time. A professional needs ambition, but also ethics. A child needs facilities, but also values. A marriage needs financial security, but also loyalty, patience, and shared simplicity.

References:

¹ MoSPI HCES 2023–24; Reuters household spending report.

² Mordor Intelligence India Foodservice Market 2026.

³ Workforce participation analysis; CEDA/Ashoka PLFS commentary.

⁴ RBI-linked household debt reporting; Reuters FSR coverage.

⁵ Transparency International CPI 2024.

⁶ Moldes, “Materialism and interpersonal relationships,” 2024.

⁷ Psychological corruption and materialism research.

Journey well taken

Sharing life insights on marketing and motorcycling adventures.

Connect

contact@danishspeaks.com